The Sexual Decadence of Weimar Germany by Lasha Darkmoon

“The decay of moral values in all areas of life—the period of deepest German degradation—coincided exactly with the height of Jewish power in Germany.”  — Dr Friederich Karl Wiehe, Germany and the Jewish Question. [1]

Otto Dix, Metropolis (1928). Berlin in the heyday of the Weimar Republic: a hedonistic hellpit of sexual depravity.

Otto Dix, Metropolis (1928).
Berlin in the heyday of the Weimar Republic: a hedonistic hellpit of sexual depravity.

No account of the Jewish Question in Germany can be complete without some mention of the tidal wave of sexual immorality that was to engulf the country during the period of the Weimar Republic (1919-1933) following World War One. This also happened to be the apogee of Jewish power in Germany. Every single sphere of major influence had now fallen under Jewish control.

1. THE CULTURAL TAKEOVER OF GERMANY BY THE JEWS

Dr Karl Wiehe, in his Germany and the Jewish Question, is painstaking in the details he provides:

Well before 1933 the Jews had taken possession of the film industry even more thoroughly than of the theater. That was understandable, because the earnings in the film industry overshadow the earnings of any other artistic activity….
The biggest step in the direction of the decline of the German cultural life [however] was taken in the field of the light entertainment genre. Here—in the genre of musical comedy and above all in revue and burlesque—frivolity and lasciviousness were to rear their ugly heads. So much so that during these years Berlin was quite correctly considered the most immoral city in the world.
It was Jews who introduced this pornographic “art form” to Germany, a debased genre completely unknown before the Great War, and so it is the Jews who can be held responsible for the general decline in morals.
The Jewish sexologists Ivan Bloch and Magnus Hirschfeld became the representatives of “sex research” camouflaged as science—a bogus science that was merely an excuse for pornography and propaganda designed to destroy the institute of marriage and the sanctity of the family. [2]

Wiehe provides the following useful facts and statistics: Continue reading

Adolf and Icke: The Long Road Back to Historical Reality by Arthur Topham

“We call them “Nazis” just to piss them off.”

~ Friedrich Hollaender, from the 2003 CBC mini-series, “Hitler – The Rise of Evil” [thanks to Justice4Germans.com]

“Exposing the evil of Nazism. Absolutely.”

~ David Icke, in an email to Radical Press publisher Arthur Topham, Sept. 24, 2013

On September 22nd, 2013 I ran an article on RadicalPress.com which I received via email from David Icke. It concerned efforts on the part of Icke and his supporters to start a television station called “The People’s Voice”*. The email was basically a promotional advertisement video designed to increase donations and solicit funding for his project.

Having promoted Icke off and on over the past fifteen years, beginning with my now defunct newspaper The Radical, (circa 1998 – 2002), in which I ran ads for his upcoming tours here in Canada as well as articles plus a front page spread covering his 2002 spring speaking tour that I attending in Vancouver on March 25th of 2002, I was fairly well versed in the materials which David was speaking and writing about.

The March 2002 edition of The Radical.
The March 2002 edition of The Radical.

Continue reading

The Chemtrail Conspiracy: Show me the Evidence

1953-adams-rails-and-jet-trailsLG
1954, A photo by Ansel Adams entitled “Rails and Jet Trails” Adams died in 1984. See here.

One thing regarding the so-called chemtrail conspiracy that I find incredibly interesting is the lack of anything even resembling real evidence. The standard theory is that these things just showed up sometime between 1997 and 1999 and that there is a difference between a ‘contrail’ and a ‘chemtrail.’ Contrails dissipate slowly, and chemtrails linger for hours, the conspiracy peddler’s claim. The evidence given for this is that people just started seeing them around that time, and then they would start to feel sick. Presenting that evidence, and that evidence alone, they began selling the idea that the government must be spraying us with toxic chemicals in order to depopulate the world, as well as perhaps modify the weather – they could also be pretending to modify the weather, while actually poisoning us. How scientific.

The only problem is that it is easily provable that the trails in the sky that we see today have been around for close to 100 years. There are 100’s of pictures, dozens of references in newspaper and magazine articles, scientific reports, and even TV references, including a 1959 episode of The Twilight Zone. (Uh-oh, conspiracy theorists are going to have a field day with that one: predictive programming?)

Debates between detractors and supporters usually consist of the one side saying “show me the evidence,” and the other side either saying “look up in the sky,” or pointing to endless graphs and charts of data of alleged test samples and weather statistics that you would have to be a scientist and spend thousands of hours to even understand. There’s not even a pretense that there is any tangible evidence of where this operation is coming from. Essentially, the chemtrailers believe that this is a super-secret government-funded operation to spray the whole world without our knowledge or consent in order to depopulate and make everybody sick. Nobody knows the location of any of the airports where they launch these secret planes from, no one that ever flew one or worked with one has come forward, there’s no paper trail of where all these so-called chemicals are coming from, etc. – it’s that “top secret.” I do believe that the governments carry out covert operations, of course, but to believe in an operation of this scale to be happening for no clear purpose, you would have to be extremely gullible and have a pretty wild imagination. How much is this operation costing? Where is the funding coming from? Our tax money? How many people are involved that are not talking? Why would the government spend all this money simply to poison people?

Continue reading